Not_RMR wrote:I hate both of them.
3legcat wrote:watched Taking Woodstock last weekend, terrible
next up Eye of God


THE LOVER wrote:Yea, it's kind of a loser topic, but you do understand where America? We speak well English in America.
Beldo wrote:Yikes, Bobbsy, that post was quite spoilerific for peeps who haven't seen it!
THE LOVER wrote:Yea, it's kind of a loser topic, but you do understand where America? We speak well English in America.
Blaze wrote:I figured out the basic twist as well, but still couldn't get the pieces to fit, like I thought he had burnt down his apartment, and I was wondering if they were gonna do the Bob Mentioned Plot Twist of "Well he was fucking crazy" and was never really sure if what he/we the audience were seeing was real. I think it led to a sense of paranoia. I think you were supposed to be guessing this. It was just too obvious. I didn't know if they were going to double back on us and make the twist be that the place really was run by evil geniuses.
THE LOVER wrote:Yea, it's kind of a loser topic, but you do understand where America? We speak well English in America.

Tuxedo T-shirt wrote:I think my preference for an ending - and I think this colors how you make the whole movie, - is to make it ambiguous. Like, he gets away but you don't know if he's crazy or not. Or he stays but you don't know. They fucking flashback the whole thing though so that you know exactly what happened, and then my thought was, "Well, why the fuck is he in an asylum? I'd probably do the same thing and I'm not crazy." But then they just conveniently tell you that he's crazy, and we have to believe them. And it's like, it'd be cool if maybe he was a little crazy, but maybe they were also kind of evil geniuses.
Return to News, Films, Books and Politics
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests